Tomato plant growth and SPAD index in different nitrogen sources and levels

Authors

  • John Silva Porto UESB
  • Rafael de Queiroz Costa
  • Tiyoko Nair Hojo Rebouças
  • Odair Lacerda Lemos
  • José Magno Queiroz Luz
  • Yuri Ferreira Amorim

Keywords:

Solanum lycopersicum, chlorophyll, nitrogen fertilization.

Abstract

Nitrogen is one element required by plants, so the levels these nutrient present in plant tissues directly interferes on growth, development and production. The type of fertilizer and the under or over fertilization can significantly affect agricultural production in this context. Aim this study was to evaluate the effects of different nitrogen sources and levels on tomato plants growth and development. The experiment conducted at State University of Southwest Bahia, Vitória da Conquista – BA. The experimental design randomized complete block, with four replications in factorial 3 x 3 + 1, using 3 sources of nitrogen (calcium nitrate, urea and ammonium sulfate) and 3 doses (140, 280 and 420 kg ha -1) and an absolute control. The relative growth rate, height, main stem diameter, shoots dry mass and SPAD index analyzed. The height, stem diameter and SPAD increased linearly according to increase of N rates, while plants treated with NO3- had higher dry mass and SPAD reading.

References

1. Andriolo JL, Ross TD, Witter M. Crescimento, desenvolvimento e produtividade do tomateiro cultivado em substrato com três concentrações de nitrogênio na solução nutritiva. Cienc Rural, 2004; 34(5): 48-56.
2. Bar-Tal A, Aloni B. Effects of Fertigation Regime on Blossom End Rot of Vegetable Fruits. International Fertilizer Correspondent, [internet]. 2008 [acesso em 2013 jun 5]; 32: 130-45 Disponível em:<http://www.ipipotash.org/udocs/10_BarTal_et_al_Effects_of_Fertigation_Regim-e_on_Blossom_End_Rot_p130-145.pdf>.
3. Berova M, Karanatsidis G, Sapundzhieva K, Nikolova V. Effect of organic fertilization on growth and yield of peppers plants. Folia Hortc. 2010; 22(1): 3-7.
4. Borgognone D, Colla G, Rouphael Y, Mariateresa C, Rea E, Schwarz D. Effect of nitrogen form and nutrient solution pH on growth and mineral composition of self-grafted and grafted tomatoes. Sci Hortic. 2013; 149(1): 61–9.
5. Fayad JA, Fontes PCR, Cardoso AA, Finger LF, Ferreira FA. Crescimento e produção do tomateiro cultivado sob condições de campo e de ambiente protegido. Hort Bras. 2001; 19(3): 232-7.
6. Ferreira MMM, Ferreira GB, Fontes PCR, Dantas JP. Índice spad e teor de clorofila no limbo foliar do tomateiro em função de doses de nitrogênio e da adubação orgânica, em duas épocas de cultivo. Rev Ceres. 2006; 53(305): 83-92.
7. Ge TD, Song SW, Chi MH, Huang DF, Iwasak K. Effects of nitrogen forms on carbon and nitrogen accumulation in tomato seedling. Agric Sci China. 2008; 7(11): 1308-17.
8. Gloser V, Gloser J. Nitrogen and base cation uptake in seedlings of Acer pseudoplatanus and Calamagrostis villosa exposed to an acidified environment. Plant Soil. 2000; 226: 71–7.
9. Guertal EA, Kemble JM. Response of field-grown tomatoes to nitrogen sources. Hort Techn. 1998; 8(3): 386-91.
10. Gweyi-Onyango JP, Neumann G, Roemheld V. Effects of different forms of nitrogen on relative growth rate and growth components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Afr J Hort Sci. 2009; 2: 43-55.
11. Nieuwhof M, Garretsen F, Van Oeveren JC. Growth analyses of tomato genotypes grown under low energy condictions. Neth J Agr Sci 1991; 39:191-6.
12. Rahayu YSP, Walch-Liu G, Neumann V, Römheld N, Wirén V, Bangerth F. Root-derived cytokinins as long-distance signals for NO3- induced stimulation of leaf growth. J Exp Bot. 2005; 56: 1143-52.
13. Ramos A, Bovi MLA, Folegatti MV, Diotto AV. Efeitos da fertirrigação sobre a produção de palmito da pupunheira. Hort Bras. 2004; 22(4): 734-9.14. Reis JS, et al. Revista Agrotecnologia, Anápolis, v. 4, n. 2, p. 68 - 84, 2013
15. Ulissi V, Antonucci F, Benincasa P, Farneselli M, Tosti G, Guiducci M, Tei F, Costa C, Pallottino F. Nitrogen concentration estimation in tomato leaves by vis-nir non-destructive spectroscopy. Sensors. 2011; 11: 6411-24.16. Van Raij B, Cantarella H, Quaggio AJ, Furlani AMC. Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. 2.ed. Campinas: IAC; 1996.
17. Vavrina CS, Hochmuth GJ, Cornell JA, Olson SM. Nitrogen fertilization of Florida-grown tomato plants: seasonal variation in greenhouse and field performance. Hortscience, 1998; 32: 251-4.18. Witte CP. Urea metabolism in plants. Plant Sci. 2011; 180: 431–8.
19. Woolhouse HW, Hardwick K. The growth of tomato seedlings in relation to the form of the nitrogen supply. New Phytol, 1966; 65(4): 518-25.
20. Zuffo AM, Andrade FR, Schossler TR, Milhomem DM, Piauilino AC. Eficiência na determinação indireta do nitrogênio foliar a partir do índice SPAD. Enc Bio, 2012; 8(15); 805-820.

Published

2014-11-06

How to Cite

Porto, J. S., de Queiroz Costa, R., Hojo Rebouças, T. N., Lacerda Lemos, O., Queiroz Luz, J. M., & Ferreira Amorim, Y. (2014). Tomato plant growth and SPAD index in different nitrogen sources and levels. Scientia Plena, 10(11). Retrieved from https://scientiaplena.emnuvens.com.br/sp/article/view/2041

Most read articles by the same author(s)